Гуглоиды и водород

как раз с передачей данных нет проблем...

... Much of the analysis done for the paper is based on how the Loon has impacted the traditional Terrestrial LTE network. Specifically,
if Loon could be used alongside the terrestrial network by providing adequate coverage in areas the terrestrial network could not
cover. Loon only has a modest inimical impact on the existing terrestrial LTE network while enhancing coverage in areas where
terrestrial LTE coverage doesn’t exist. When a new cellular base station gets deployed in an LTE network it will generate some
interference with the adjacent cells. Loon is no different. However, in a study conducted by “Signals Research Group”, it was
detected that Loon’s presence in weak terrestrial coverage areas since the Loon signal strength was usually below -100 dBm.
Additionally, self-interference within terrestrial LTE sites, which is common in an LTE network, existed even in the absence of
Loon while Loon’s contribution to interference in the LTE network was somewhat similar to the interference created by other
terrestrial cell sites. The self-interference in the terrestrial network was also present in areas with strong RSRP while Loon’s impact
on the terrestrial network was often restricted to a small region of the network – outside that region, Loon provided coverage where
the terrestrial network coverage was not sufficient or the Loon signal strength was adequately below the terrestrial network that it
had the least effect on the terrestrial LTE network. It can be said that in the absence of Loon, the quality of the signal in the terrestrial
network was no different than the signal quality with Loon.
The User Experience with Loon was amazingly good. Apart from data speeds and latency, Loon’s performance with popular mobile
data applications, such as web browsing, video chat, YouTube, and downloading applications from Google Play. Web page load
times were very equivalent with Wi-Fi and LTE – occasionally a bit faster and occasionally a bit slower. The study conducted by
“Signals Research Group”, their experience with streaming 360p and 720p videos was agreeable with minimal buffering, but despite
the fact that the video start time took a little too long as compared to the terrestrial LTE network (2x20 MHz channel bandwidth)
and Wi-Fi. Likewise, the download times with Google Play took a bit more time with Loon as compared to the terrestrial LTE
network, but it is an inequitable comparison since the Google Play (and YouTube) tests took place in Tarapoto, Peru where the
operator has LTE deployed in Band 4 (2x20 MHz channels) and the Loon testing was conducted in a region where terrestrial LTE
coverage didn’t exist. Testing was also conducted with video chat calls (Google Duo) back to the United States from Peru, and while
the quality of the video was not as bad as we experience when we use video chat applications at home, it was decent without any
evident video freezes or audio dropping.

...

https://www.ijariit.com/manuscripts/v7i3/V7I3-1708.pdf

это причем на по сути стандартном оборудовании...

есть технические моменты с погодой, управлением, материалами и прч ... но в целом... с таким ценником у не серийного (!) производства, мягко говоря терпимо.

не у всех есть... и не везде могут летать... разные сценарии использования можно рассмотреть.

Есть список сбитых спутников?