Чудесатее и чудесатее. Удивительное рядом, но оно запрещено

Чёт мне лень лезть назад в ту книгу в поисках фамилии того, кто доказал. Или считается, что доказал. Почитай Trespassing on Einstein's Lawn. Это не значит, что я с ними согласен. Просто пишу, как оно там сейчас.

“It was time to rethink the universe, Hawking said—and that meant working from the top down. It meant starting with the observer and working backward toward the origin of time. The top-down approach, Hawking wrote, “leads to a profoundly different view of cosmology, and the relation between cause and effect.” In this approach, “histories of the universe … depend on what is being observed, contrary to the usual idea that the universe has a unique, observer independent history.”

“when no one’s looking, a photon travels multiple, mutually exclusive paths simultaneously. If I turn on a lamp, a photon travels from the bulb to my eye. Common sense tells me that it travels in a straight line, but, as usual in physics, common sense is wrong. If I were to run the lamp-to-eye experiment many times, somehow recording the interference pattern that results on my retina, I could reconstruct the photon’s travels and, according to Feynman, I would find that en route to my eye the photon had simultaneously navigated infinite paths throughout the entire universe, no matter how unlikely those paths may seem. In one it bounces off the Moon, circles the tower of London, and skims John Brockman’s hat before hitting my retina. In another, it flies by the Great Pyramid, hitches a ride on an elephant, and skirts the horizon of a black hole. In still others, it laps the universe. Once. Twice. It ricochets off every mirror. It does the hokey pokey. It turns itself around.
The probability for each path takes the form of a wavefunction, and the waves’ phases interfere constructively in some places and destructively in others. The most absurd routes are easily canceled out by equally absurd but oppositely aligned routes. When all interference is accounted for, the last wave standing gives a high probability for the most reasonable path: the straight line, lamp to eye.
There’s just one weird mathematical trick you have to employ to get Feynman’s procedure to work: you have to add the waves in imaginary time. Imaginary time isn’t “pretend time”—it’s a time coordinate written with an imaginary number; that is, a number multiplied by i, where i^2 = -1. And the point is, it works. Using imaginary time instead of real time yields the right probabilities for the outcomes of experiments.”

“The universe doesn’t have a single history, but every possible history, each with its own probability,” Hertog said. Sum those together, letting their probability waves interfere until only one wave remains, and you’ve determined the history of the universe.”

“As Hertog talked, it began to sink in just how strange this idea was. It wasn’t like they were reverse-engineering the universe to uncover its actual history. No. They were saying that the universe had no history—history is created the minute we make a measurement. In the present. Now. “As observers, we play an active role,” Hertog said. By making a measurement, we select out a subset of all possible histories, and from those histories a single past unfurls.”

“Hawking and Hertog bought into the string landscape—but they didn’t accept eternal inflation as the means for populating it with physical universes. Instead, they saw the varied worlds described by string theory as possible histories that exist not in physical space but in the mathematical superposition from which our universe’s history is derived. You can still use anthropic arguments to explain all the apparent fine-tuning without ever having to reference anything outside our own cosmic horizon. Hawking and Hertog had turned the landscape on its head: instead of multiple universes with a single history, you have a single universe with multiple histories.”

“Instead of starting with a cosmic history and evolving observers, top-down cosmology starts with observers and evolves a history. And if you start with life, you’re bound to end up with a life-friendly universe.”

“Why an anthropic principle? I wrote in my notebook. Because the universe is observer-dependent?
Such jewel-toned thoughts about life made me nervous—any theory that relied on humans or consciousness as being some kind of “special” ingredient instantly struck me as crackpot. But Hawking and Hertog weren’t suggesting that observers’ consciousness magically collapses the wavefunction of the universe. In their model, there’s no collapse, just the interference of the universe’s many paths through history. It wasn’t like you needed life to create a universe; it was simply that there is life in this one, therefore the only histories relevant to the quantum sum will inevitably be life-supporting ones. Which of course was all a bit circular in its logic. Like a self-excited circuit.”

“From a certain point of view, which Wheeler adopts, systems can become classical only when observed. They behave quantum mechanically and indeterminately until observed, and the observation collapses the wavefunction. So Wheeler conceives of the universe as having been born and having evolved quantum mechanically until it naturally generates life. Then that life performs the observation that collapses the state of the universe to make it classical. It’s self-excited in the sense that the observation comes from within the universe, not from the outside.”

Excerpt From
Trespassing on Einstein's Lawn: A Father, a Daughter, the Meaning of Nothing, and the Beginning of Everything
Gefter, Amanda
This material may be protected by copyright.

Осторожнее, этот господин тут всерьез утверждал, что египетские пирамиды аккумулируют электрическую энергию. Будучи построенными из диэлектрика.

Это не эксперимент тогда раз курили вещества, а его ИМИТАЦИЯ.

не останавливайтесь на достигнутом...

Ампри больших дозах травы этот тонкий мир так толсто вторгается, что аж жить мешает😂? 

согласен, мама так ткани проверяла - на ХХХм многосотметрового рулона есть столько то метров брака, когда соссклада забирали, она сама не знала как оно но вот работает как метод, потмоу и замдиректора фирмы швейной по производству была. В общем до 20-30% экономии средств фирмы на закупки тканей.

Не думаю, это не с рождения и никаких необычных потрясений не было, вроде как, кроме того, что происходит со всеми. Муж предполагает, что это ассоциации и интуиция. 

Неее это нос

у Уитни "психология собаки" описан случай про кундхаунда (древесную гончую)

так та верхним чутьем через несколько часов (> 8?) за несколько км (> 10?) пропавшего человека нашла

_____________________________

Такое обоняние редкий случай, владелице повезло

Фильм смотрела. Или книга, как обычно, о другом?) 

Надо посмотреть, спасибо.